How do you react to conflict? Do you have a typical style as a leader when dealing with a conflict situation? Complete the Conflict Style Questionnaire. What do the results of the questionnaire suggest might be your dominant conflict-management style? Can you describe a situation in which you utilized that dominate style? Is there another situation when you used a different style? Is there a best style? What benefits are there for a leader to be aware of and able to use multiple conflict-management styles?
Based on your findings, write a two- to three-page paper in APA format. With at least three valid sources
What causes conflict in organizations? Many of the organizational behavior topics that have been addressed in the class thus far include the opportunity for conflict to emerge. For example, conflict is a consideration if we talk about decision making, change, vision/values alignment, interpersonal relationships, teams, communication, and trust. Although some conflict in an organization might have positive benefits, using the above list of topics to get your thinking started, discuss 4-5 “causes” of negative conflict (i.e., conflict as organizational behaviors that inhibit organizational productivity). For example, how might lack of alignment to organizational vision and values cause negative conflict, or how might lack of trust cause negative conflict? Provide examples from your organization or an organization you know that illustrate the causes of conflict you discuss, including any observed consequences of the conflict. Also, discuss possible steps that leaders might take to prevent and/or solve negative conflict occurring in the organization.
Based on your findings, write a 3-4 page paper in APA format. At least three valid sources.
You have been assigned the task as Marketing Manager to scan social media web sites and try to mitigate the negative consumer postings from a recent crisis.
On January 1, 2012, Aspen Company acquired 80 percent of Birch Company’s outstanding voting stock for $288,000. Birch reported a $300,000 book value and the fair value of the noncontrolling interest was $72,000 on that date. Also, on January 1, 2013, Birch acquired 80 percent of Cedar Company for $104,000 when Cedar had a $100,000 book value and the 20 percent noncontrolling interest was valued at $26,000. In each acquisition, the subsidiary’s excess acquisition-date fair over book value was assigned to a trade name with a 30-year life.
These companies report the following financial information. Investment income figures are not included.
2012 2013 2014 Sales: Aspen Company $ 415,000 $ 545,000 $ 688,000 Birch Company 200,000 280,000 400,000 Cedar Company Not available 160,000 210,000 Expenses: Aspen Company $ 310,000 $ 420,000 $ 510,000 Birch Company 160,000 220,000 335,000 Cedar Company Not available 150,000 180,000 Dividends declared: Aspen Company $ 20,000 $ 40,000 $ 50,000 Birch Company 10,000 20,000 20,000 Cedar Company Not available 2,000 10,000
Assume that each of the following questions is independent:
a. If all companies use the equity method for internal reporting purposes, what is the December 31, 2013, balance in Aspen’s Investment in Birch Company account? a. If all companies use the equity method for internal reporting purposes, what is the December 31, 2013, balance in Aspen’s Investment in Birch Company account?
b. What is the consolidated net income for this business combination for 2014?
c. What is the net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest in 2014?
d. Assume that Birch made intra-entity inventory transfers to Aspen that have resulted in the following unrealized gross profits at the end of each year:
Date Amount 12/31/12 $10,000 12/31/13 16,000 12/31/14 25,000
What is the realized income of Birch in 2013 and 2014, respectively?
check my work referencese book & resources
Think of a situation that can be modeled with a linear inequality. This must be a situation where more than one possible solution is acceptable.
Describe your situation and why more than one solution is possible. Write an inequality to model the situation and solve this inequality. You will want to show your work when solving your inequality. Be sure to explain why you chose the inequality symbol you chose, paying careful attention to the difference between <. >, < and > . Explain in words what the graph of your solution set would look like; include a discussion about the type of circle used at the boundary point and about whether the graph is shaded to the left or right. To include the underline under an inequality sign, choose the underline function on the Discussion Board to create a < or > symbol.
An Example of the Assignment:
The other day, I went to the post office to mail a care package to my mother. The post office informed me the cost would be $2.00 for the box and $1.50 per pound to mail the item. I only walked into the post office with a $10.00 bill. What is the maximum weight of the package (assuming no sales tax for this example) I could mail?
In this case, more than one solution is possible as there are several weights for the package that would cost less than $10.00 to mail.
Let w=the weight of the package.
I could model this situation with the following inequality:
2+1.5w<10 To solve I will take the following steps:
The maximum weight the package can be is 5.33 pounds.
I chose the < as the package could weigh less than or equal to 5.33 pounds. If it was exactly 5.33 pounds, I would spend all $10.00 but still have enough money to mail the package. Any weight less than 5.33 pounds is also a possible solution as I would have enough money to mail the package.
The graph of this solution would have a closed circle at 5.33 (between 5 and 6) and an arrow that extends to the left on the number line.
(Learning Objectives 2, 3: Account for issuance of stock; show how treasury stock transactions affect stockholders’ equity) Journalize the following transactions of Alameda Productions:
Jan 21 Issued 1,800 shares of $1.25 par common stock at $13 per share.
Jun 23 Purchased 500 shares of treasury stock at $15 per share.
Jul 12 Sold 400 shares of treasury stock at $22 per share.
What was the overall effect of these transactions on Alameda’s stockholders’ equity?
(Learning Objectives 2, 3, 4: Account for issuance of stock; show how treasury stock affects a company; account for dividends) At December 31, 2012, Blumenthal Corporation reported the stockholders’ equity accounts shown here (with dollar amounts in millions, except per-share amounts).
Common stock $3.00 par value per share, 2,400 million shares issued ……………………………..$7,200
Capital in excess of par value…………………………………7,200
Treasury stock, at cost…………………………………………….. (80)
Total stockholders equity………………………………….$14,610
Blumenthal’s 2013 transactions included the following:
a. Net income, $450 million b. Issuance of 22 million shares of common stock for $14.00 per share c. Purchase of 9 million shares of treasury stock for $18 million d. Declaration and payment of cash dividends of $32 million
1. Journalize Blumenthal’s transactions in b, c, and d. Explanations are not required.
Consider ways to use technology for effective teaching. Recommend at least two ways you use or plan to use technology with your students. Provide a rationale to support your response.
From the first and second e-Activities, analyze the key ways in which Intel and Microsoft capitalized on and reaped substantial first-mover advantages in pioneering new technologies. Provide a rationale to support your response. From the first and second e-Activities, compare Intel’s and Microsoft’s strategies in terms of their ability to profit from innovation. Next, analyze the manner in which shifts in new technologies revolutionized the structure of the industry, increasing profitability and growth through global expansion. Provide a rationale to support your response.
“Poverty and Pollution” Please respond to the following” Read Case 7.2: Poverty and Pollution, located here or on page 267 in your textbook. Next, predict the effects of pollution permits on poor, less-developed areas like Brazil’s “valley of death.” Assess the effectiveness of incentive programs on manufacturers in less-developed areas. Based on your assessment, provide an argument in support of either pollution permits or incentive programs.
it is referred to as brazil’s “valley of death,” and it may be the most polluted place on Earth. It lies about an hour’s drive south of São Paulo, where the land suddenly drops 2,000 feet to a coastal plain. More than 100,000 people live in the valley, along with a variety of industrial plants that discharge thousands of tons of pollutants into the air every day. A reporter for National Geographic recalls that within an hour of his arrival in the valley, his chest began aching as the polluted air inflamed his bronchial tubes and restricted his breathing.101 The air in the valley is loaded with toxins—among them benzene, a known carcinogen. One in ten of the area’s factory workers has a low white-blood-cell count, a possible precursor to leukemia. Infant mortality is 10 percent higher here than in the region as a whole. Of the 40,000 urban residents in the valley municipality of Cubatão, nearly 13,000 suffer from respiratory disease. Few of the local inhabitants complain, however. For them, the fumes smell of jobs. They also distrust bids to buy their property by local industry, which wants to expand, as well as government efforts to relocate them to free homesites on a landfill. One young mother says, “Yes, the children are often ill and sometimes can barely breathe. We want to live in another place, but we cannot afford to.” A university professor of public health, Dr. Oswaldo Campos, views the dirty air in Cubatão simply as the result of economic priorities. “Some say it is the price of progress,” Campos comments, “but is it? Look who pays the price—the poor.”102 Maybe the poor do pay the price of pollution, but there are those who believe that they should have more of it. One of them is Lawrence Summers, former director of the National Economic Council and a past president of Harvard University. He has argued that the bank should encourage the migration of dirty, polluting industries to the poorer, less-developed countries.103 Why? First, Summers reasons, the costs of health impairing pollution depend on the earnings forgone from increased injury and death. So polluting should be done in the countries with the lowest costs—that is, with the lowest wages. “The economic logic behind dumping a load of toxic waste in the lowest-wage country,” he writes, “is impeccable.” Second, because pollution costs rise disproportionately as pollution increases, it makes sense to shift pollution from already dirty places such as Los Angeles to clean ones like the relatively underpopulated countries in Africa, whose air Summers describes as “vastly under-polluted.” Third, people value a clean environment more as their incomes rise. If other things are equal, costs fall if pollution moves from affluent places to less affluent places. Critics charge that Summers views the world through “the distorting prism of market economics” and that his ideas are “a recipe for ruin.” Not only do the critics want “greener” development in the third world, but also they are outraged by Summers’s assumption that the value of a life—or of increases or decreases in life expectancy—can be measured in terms of per capita income. This premise implies that an American’s life is worth that of a hundred Kenyans and that society should value an extra year of life for a middle-level manager more than it values an extra year for a blue-collar, production-line worker. Some economists, however, believe that Summers’s ideas are basically on the right track. They emphasize that environmental policy always involves trade-offs and that therefore we should seek a balance between costs and benefits. As a matter of fact, the greatest cause of misery in the third world is poverty. If environmental controls slow growth, then fewer people will be lifted out of poverty by economic development. For this reason, they argue, the richer countries should not impose their standards of environmental protection on poorer nations. But even if economic growth is the cure for poverty, other economists now believe that sound environmental policy is necessary for durable growth, or at least that growth and environmental protection may not be incompatible. First, environmental damage can undermine economic productivity, and the health effects of pollution on a country’s workforce reduce output. Second, poverty itself is an important cause of environmental damage because people living at subsistence levels are unable to invest in environmental protection. Finally, if economic growth and development are defined broadly enough, then enhanced environmental quality is part and parcel of the improvement in welfare that development must bring. For example, 1 billion people in developing countries lack access to clean water while 1.7 billion suffer from inadequate sanitation. Economic development for them means improving their environment. Still, rich and poor countries tend to have different environmental agendas: Environmentalists in affluent nations worry about protecting endangered species, preserving biological diversity, saving the ozone layer, and preventing climate change, whereas their counterparts in poorer countries are more concerned with dirty air, dirty water, soil erosion, and deforestation. However, global warming—heretofore of concern mostly to people in the developed world— threatens to reverse the progress that the world’s poorest nations are gradually making toward prosperity. Or so concludes a 2007 U.N. study.104 It offers a detailed view of how poor areas, especially near the equator, are extremely vulnerable to the water shortages, droughts, flooding rains, and severe storms that increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases are projected to make more frequent, and the authors call on rich countries to do more to curb emissions linked to global warming and to help poorer nations leapfrog to energy sources that pollute less than coal and oil.
Update According to a World Bank report, environmental conditions have improved in Cubatão, where, thanks to state action and an aroused population, pollution is no worse today than in other medium-size industrial cities in Brazil. True, it’s no paradise, but some days you can see the sun, children are healthier, and fish are returning to the river (though their tissues are laced with toxic metals).105
DISCUSSION QUESTIONS 1. What attitudes and values on the part of business and others lead to the creation of areas like the “valley of death”? 2. Should the third world have more pollution, as Lawrence Summers argues? Assess his argument that dirty industries should move to poorer and less-polluted areas. 3. Some say, “Pollution is the price of progress.” Is this assertion correct? What is meant by “progress”? Who in fact pays the price? Explain the moral and the economic issues raised by the assertion. What are the connections between economic progress and development, on the one hand, and pollution controls and environmental protection, on the other? 4. Do human beings have a moral right to a livable environment? To a nonpolluted environment? It might be argued that if people in the “valley of death” don’t complain and don’t wish to move, then they accept the risks of living there and the polluters are not violating their rights. Assess this argument. 5. Assess the contention that people in the third world should learn from the errors of the West and seek development without pollution. Should there be uniform, global environmental standards, or should pollution-control standards be lower for less-developed countries? 6. Even though they will probably be hit hardest by it, poor nations are less able than are rich countries to deal with the consequences of global warming. As a result, do rich nations owe to it to poorer nations to curb their own emissions more than they otherwise would be inclined to do? Do they have an obligation to provide poorer nations with, or help them develop, greener industries and sources of energy? Explain why or why not
Due Week 6 and worth 250 points Review Case 7 “The Evolution of the Small Package Express Delivery Industry, 1973 – 2010″, located in the textbook to complete this assignment
Write a five to seven (5-7) page paper in which you: 1. Analyze Federal Express’s value creation frontier, and determine which of the four building blocks of competitive advantage the company needs in order to continue to maintain above-average profitability. Provide a rationale to support the response. 2. Determine the main aspect of product differentiation and capacity control that Federal Express could use in order to maintain an edge over its rivals. Justify the response. 3. Assess the efficiency of Federal Express’s current business model, and recommend one (1) new business-level strategy that gives the company a competitive advantage over its rivals. Provide a rationale for the recommendation. 4. Examine the manner in which overall global competition may impact the new business strategy that you recommended in Question 3. Next, suggest one (1) significant way that Federal Express may confront its global competition. 5. Use at least three (3) quality academic resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar type Websites do not qualify as academic resources.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements: Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.