Monthly Archives: August 2016

Unit 5 Legal Aspects Of Safety

Uncategorized
Click here to order similar paper @Essaybay.net. 100% Original.Written from scratch by professional writers.


Click here to order similar paper @Essaybay.net. 100% Original.Written from scratch by professional writers.

Unit V Assignment You managed to schedule an informal conference with the area director at the regional OSHA office four days after you receive the Notice of Citations and Penalty. Based on the citations and penalties you received in Unit III, prepare a document that lists the citations and penalties you wish to discuss with the area director. You should summarize what you are trying to accomplish in regard to each citation/penalty you choose, to include:  the information you will use to try and accomplish your goal,  the information you will take with you to the meeting, and  who will accompany you to the meeting. You must support your actions with reliable sources. Your grade will be based on your ability to present a case to your professor (serving as the area director) to reduce either the severity of some citations, or the amount of some penalties. If you simply state that you accept the citations and penalties as written, you will receive a minimal score on the assignment. Your response must be a minimum of two pages in length, not including the title page and reference page. You must use at least one reference in the paper. All sources must be cited in the text and on the reference page, using APA style. Information about accessing the Blackboard Grading Rubric for this assignment is provided below.



Click here to order similar paper @Essaybay.net. 100% Original.Written from scratch by professional writers.

Oil And Gas Management Project

Uncategorized
Click here to order similar paper @Essaybay.net. 100% Original.Written from scratch by professional writers.


Click here to order similar paper @Essaybay.net. 100% Original.Written from scratch by professional writers.

       Aims of research Clearly defined objectives/research questions relevant to aim. Clear focus on aims / objectives maintained throughout. If appropriate, hypotheses defined and explained. Literature review Thorough review of appropriate secondary sources; relationship between the literature and the project explored (i.e. justification is linked to literature) Research methodology Explanation and justification of an appropriate methodology – approach and data collection techniques appropriate to aims and research questions.

Coursework Assignment Brief

 

Semester: C16 Summer 2016
Module Code: POG 360
Module Title: Oil and Gas Management Project
Programme BSc (Honours)
Level: Level 6
Awarding Body: Plymouth University
Module Leader Paul Booth
Format: Report
Presentation: No
Any special requirements: All work should be submitted as two hard copies with an acceptable Turnitin Report
Word Limit: 10,000 words for report and maximum 500 words for personal statement.  (+/- 10%)
Deadline date for submission: TBA
Learning outcomes to be examined in this assessment (please note that this is NOT the assessment task) ·        Provide a detailed analysis of the policies designed to achieve stated corporate objectives of one or more organisation in the oil and gas industry, and an examination of the problems related to resource acquisition and deployment relevant to those policies.·        Provide a relevant literature review on the problems investigated and relate current management theory to practical recommendations.

·        Demonstrate a lucid and logic discourse containing objectives of the project, methodology, relevant literature review, recommendations for action, appropriate references and bibliography.

·        Demonstrate the elements of autonomy, personal responsibility and critical analysis and evaluation

·        Break down a project proposal into component parts and construct a time and cost constrained project plan towards its completion

·        Reflecting on Personal Development Planning
Percentage of marks awarded for module: This assignment is worth 100% of the total marks for the module

 

Assessment criteria Explanatory comments on  the assessment criteria   Maximum marks for each section 
Aims of research Clearly defined objectives/research questions relevant to aim. Clear focus on aims / objectives maintained throughout. If appropriate, hypotheses defined and explained. 10%
Literature review Thorough review of appropriate secondary sources; relationship between the literature and the project explored (i.e. justification is linked to literature) (20%)
Research methodology Explanation and justification of an appropriate methodology – approach and data collection techniques appropriate to aims and research questions. (20%)
Data Analysis Appropriate analysis of data in the light of the research objectives and questions. Clear and analytical presentation of findings. (10%)
Discussion – Results discussed, highlighting significant findings and comparing theory & practice where appropriate (10%)
Conclusions / recommendations Based on a reasonable interpretation of both the research conducted and the existing literature. (10%)
Critical evaluation Critical evaluation of own work. Areas for further research identified and discussed. (5%)
Overall layout and Presentation is of an acceptable standard, logical and adds value to the document. Appropriate structure. (5%)
Reflection Reflection on programme is detailed and insightful. (10%)

 

 

 

 

Background

N/A

 

Assignment Task

  1. Analyse one or more strategic problems in the oil and gas industries and produce a comprehensive report detailing the objectives, methodologies, findings, analysis, and conclusions of the research carried out above. The word length for the report is 10,000 words.
  2. Analyse the extent to which you have developed your knowledge, throughout the course and how the course and this project has helped your employability. This should be summarised as a personal statement of no more than 500 words and placed in an appendix to the main document.

 

 

 

Total Marks for Assignment: 100

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Indicative Content

Aims of research

Define objectives/research questions relevant to aim. Maintain focus on aims/objectives throughout. Define and explain hypotheses.                                                                                                                                                                                                       (Worth 10% of marks)

Literature review

Conduct thorough review of appropriate secondary sources.  Critically explore relationship between the literature and the project.                                                                                                                                                                                                                  (Worth 20% of marks)

Research methodology

Explain and justify an appropriate methodology – approach and data collection techniques appropriate to aims and research questions.                                                                                                                                                                                                         (Worth 20% of marks)

Data Analysis

Analysis of data in the light of the research objectives and questions. Analytical presentation of findings.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       (Worth 10% of marks)

Discussion

Discuss results highlighting significant findings and comparing theory & practice

(Worth 10% of marks)

Conclusions / recommendations

Formulate conclusions and recommendations based on interpretation of both the research conducted and the existing literature.

(Worth 10% of marks)

Critical evaluation

Critically evaluate work. Identify and discuss areas for further research.

(Worth 5% of marks)

Presentation

Present work to an acceptable standard that is logical and adds value to the document.

(Worth 5% of marks)

Reflection

Reflect in a detailed and insightful manner.

(Worth 10% of marks)

 

 

Marking Criteria for Assessment at Level 6 (Bachelors Degree with Honours)

Marks 0-25 (Fail) 26-39 (Fail) 40-49 (3rd) 50-59 (2.2) 60-69 (2.1) 70-85 (1st) 70-85 (1st)
Assessment categories
Knowledge & Understanding of Subject Major gaps in knowledge andunderstanding of

material at this level. Substantial

inaccuracies.

 Gaps in knowledge, with only superficialunderstanding.

Some significant inaccuracies.

 Threshold level.Understanding of key aspects of field of study; coherent knowledge, at least in part informed by current research in the subject discipline. Systematic understanding offield(s) of study, as

indicated by relevant QAA

subject benchmark statements for the degree programme.

 Good understanding of the field(s) ofstudy; coherent

knowledge, in line with subject

benchmark, at least in part informed by current research in

the subject discipline.

 Excellent knowledge and understanding ofthe main concepts

and key theories/

concepts of the discipline(s). Clear

awareness of the

limitations of the knowledge base.

 Highly detailed knowledge andunderstanding of the

main theories/concepts of the discipline(s), and

an awareness of the ambiguities and limitations of

knowledge.
Cognitive/ Intellectual Skills

 

(e.g. analysis and synthesis; logic and argument; analytical reflection; organisation and communication

of ideas and evidence)

 Unsubstantiated generalizations, made without useof any credible evidence. Lack of logic, leading to unsupportable/

missing conclusions. Lack of any attempt to analyse,

synthesise or evaluate. Poor communication of

ideas.

 Some evidence of analytical intellectual skills,but for the most part descriptive. Ideas/findings sometimes illogical

and contradictory. Generalized statements made with scant evidence.

Conclusions lack relevance.

 Threshold level.Evidence of some logical, analytical thinking and some attempts to synthesise, albeit with some weaknesses. Some evidence to support findings/

views, but evidence not consistently

interpreted. Some relevant conclusions

 Evidence of some logical, analytical thinking andsynthesis. Can analyse new and/or abstract data and situations without

guidance.

An emerging awareness of different stances and ability to use

evidence to support the argument.

Valid conclusions

 Sound, logical, analytical thinking; synthesis andevaluation. Ability to devise and sustain persuasive arguments, and to

review the reliability, validity & significance of evidence. Ability to communicate ideas and evidence

accurately and convincingly. Sound, convincing

conclusions.

 Thoroughly logical work, supported by judiciously selectedand evaluated evidence. High quality analysis, developed independently or

through effective collaboration..

Ability to investigate contradictory information and

identify reasons for contradictions. Strong conclusions.

 Exceptional work; judiciously selected and evaluatedevidence. Very high quality analysis, developed independently or

through effective collaboration.

Ability to investigate contradictory information and identify

reasons for contradictions.

Highly persuasive

conclusions.
Use of Research- informed Literature(including referencing, appropriate academic conventions and academic honesty) Little evidence of reading.Views and

findings unsupported and non-authoritative. Academic conventions largely ignored.

 Evidence of little reading and/or of reliance oninappropriate sources, and/or indiscriminate use of sources.

Academic conventions used inconsistently.

 Threshold level.References to a range of relevant sources. Some omissions and minor errors. Academic conventions evident and largely consistent, with minor lapses. Knowledge, analysis and evaluation of arange of research- informed literature, including sources retrieved, analysed

independently. Academic skills consistently applied.

 Knowledge, analysis and evaluation of a range of research-informed literature, including sources retrieved, analysed independently with

accuracy and assurance.  Good academic skills, consistently applied.

 Excellent knowledge of research informed literature embeddedin the work. Consistent analysis and evaluation of sources. High-level

academic skills consistently applied.

 Outstanding knowledge of research-informed literature embedded in the work. Consistent analysis and evaluation of sources. High-level academic skills consistently and professionally applied.
LEVEL 6 cont… 

Graduate Skills for Life and Employment

 

(e.g.  research- related skills; written, graphical and oral communication skills;

group working; problem-solving; practical and professional skills)

 Little or no evidence of therequired skills in

any of the graduate skills

identified in the programme specification at this level.

 Limited evidence of the graduate skillsidentified in the

programme specification.

Significant weaknesses evident, which suggest that the

candidate has not gained the skills necessary for graduate-level

employment.

 Research skills:Can competently undertake reasonably straightforward research tasks with minimum guidance, but with minor weaknesses.

Cancommunicate

in a range of formats, including orally, at a standard appropriate for graduate-level employment, and with limited weaknesses.

Can generallywork

effectively within

a team,negotiating

in a professional manner and managing conflict. Is largely confident and effective inidentifying and defining complex problems and

applying knowledge and methods to

their solution.

Able torecognise

own strengths and weaknessesin relation to graduate employment, with minor areas of weakness.

 Research skills:Can competently undertake reasonably straightforward research tasks with minimum guidance Cancommunicateeffectively in a range of formats, including orally, at

a standard appropriate for

graduate-level employment, and with limited weaknesses.

Can consistentlywork effectively within a team,

negotiating in a professional manner and managing conflict. Is confident and flexible inidentifying and defining complex problems and

applying knowledge and methods to

their solution. Able toevaluate

own strengths and weaknesses

in relation to graduate employment.

 Research skills:Can successfully complete a range of research-like tasks, including evaluation, with very limited external guidance. Cancommunicatewell, confidently and consistently in a range of formats, including orally, at a standard appropriate for graduate-level employment.

Can consistentlywork very well within a team,

leading & negotiating in a professional manner and managing conflict.

Is confident and flexible inidentifying and defining a range of complex

problems and

applying knowledge and methods to their solution.

Able to take initiative inevaluating own strengths and weaknesses in

relation to graduate- level professional and practical skills, and

act autonomously to

develop new areas of skills as necessary.

 Research skills:Can very successfully complete a range of research-like tasks, including evaluation, with a significant degree of autonomy. Cancommunicateprofessionally and confidently in a range of formats, at a high standard appropriate for graduate-level employment.

Can work

professionally within a team,

showing leadership skills as appropriate, managing conflict and meeting obligations.

Is professional and flexible inautonomously identifying and

defining a range of complex problems and applying knowledge and methods to their solution.

Able to show insight and autonomy in

evaluating own

strengths and weaknessesand

developing professional and practical skills needed for graduate-level employment.

 Research skills:Exceptionally successful in a wide range of research-like tasks, including evaluation, with a high degree of autonomy Cancommunicatewith an exceptionally high level of professionalism, in a range of formats, including orally, appropriate for graduate-level employment.

Canwork

exceptionally well and professionally within a team,showing leadership skills as appropriate, managing conflict, and

meeting all obligations. Is exceptionally

professional and flexible inautonomously defining and solving

a range of complex problems and applying knowledge and

methods to their

solution.

Outstanding ability toevaluate own strengths and weaknesses,showing

outstanding attributes for graduate-level employment.
Marks for Level 6 0-25 (Fail) 26-39 (Fail) 40-49 (3rd) 50-59 (2.2) 60-69 (2.1) 70-85 (1st) 86-100 (1st)

 



Click here to order similar paper @Essaybay.net. 100% Original.Written from scratch by professional writers.