‘it is simply wrong in principle for an expert to fail to set out the way in which he has reached his conclusion in his report….using a Bayesian approach…to formulate opinions placed before a jury without that process being disclosed and debated in court is contrary to principles of open justice.</o:p>

R v T [2011] 1 Cr. App. R. 9 [at 108].</o:p>

Describe, and critically analyse, how successful criminal courts have been in understanding the Bayesian approach. Consider how experts can utilise case management to fully develop, and clarify, their reasoning.</o:p>

Assessment criteria:</o:p>

1. Demonstrate an ability to identify, and apply, relevant legal authorities.</o:p>

2. Demonstrate an ability to devise, and sustain, legal argument with law in support.</o:p>

3. Use legal methodology to understand criminal litigation and present logical arguments.</o:p>

4. Demonstrate an ability to use law to make, and justify, decisions from factually incomplete, and ambiguous, scenarios.</o:p>

5. Write using clear, concise English.</o:p>

6. Reference work consistently.</o:p>

CLICK HERE TO HAVE ONE OF OUR WRITERS WRITE THIS PAPER FOR YOU AND GIVE YOU AN A+ QUALITY PAPER WITHIN THE SET DEADLINE

The assignment is to do exercises 12.1, 12.3, 12.4, 12.6, and 12.12 from the book [ Technically Write! 6th Ed, Blicq & Moretto, Pearson Prentice-Hall. 2004.] Also do Projects (exercise) 8.1 and 8.2 part 2 ONLY from Chapter 8 in the same book. NOTE: I have uploaded a copy of chapter 12 and chapter 8 that are needed for these problems

CLICK HERE TO HAVE ONE OF OUR WRITERS WRITE THIS PAPER FOR YOU AND GIVE YOU AN A+ QUALITY PAPER WITHIN THE SET DEADLINE

Find copies of the three Anti-Federalist Papers on web. Be sure to properly cite your sources using APA. Based on your readings, prepare a discussion about what the United States may have looked like had the Anti-Federalist “won” Their points in the ratification debate and the writing of the Constitution.

CLICK HERE TO HAVE ONE OF OUR WRITERS WRITE THIS PAPER FOR YOU AND GIVE YOU AN A+ QUALITY PAPER WITHIN THE SET DEADLINE

Fundamentals of Nursing Concepts NURN 153 Evidence-based Paper Webquest: Patient Safety Introduction: Patient safety is one of health care’s most important issues. Nurses play a vital role in improving patient safety and quality of care. Evidence-based practice is the key to finding and implementing the best strategies and interventions to improve patient outcomes. Task: Your nurse manager has asked your clinical group to examine the safety practices of the unit. Use evidence-based research to evaluate one of the following patient safety questions related to safety. Use the Joint Commission’s National Patient Safety Goals as a guide to evaluate your unit’s safety practices and prepare recommendations for your manager. Your patients are counting on you! Process: Choose one of the patient safety questions that relates to a situation that you observed on your unit. Find and summarize two research articles that provide evidence to answer the patient safety question. Use the recommended library resources and other credible sources (refer to your Evidence-based Practice lecture and readings). Write a 2-3 page report in which you will do the following: Describe the current safety practice you observed on your unit that relates to the question you chose. Summarize the two research articles. Answer the patient safety question using the evidence in the articles. Using what you learned from the evidence-based literature, write at least two recommendations to the nurse manager which might improve the current safety practices of your unit relating to the chosen question. Use APA format, be sure to include references. Patient Safety Questions: What are the best methods for preventing central-line associated infections? Recommended Resources: CCBC Library Databases: CINAHL & CINAHL PLUS Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition JAMA Online ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Source PubMed Other Databases: AHRQ – Agency for Healthcare Research and…

CLICK HERE TO HAVE ONE OF OUR WRITERS WRITE THIS PAPER FOR YOU AND GIVE YOU AN A+ QUALITY PAPER WITHIN THE SET DEADLINE

SHORT ANSWER ASSIGNMENT 1On the 25 May 2010 Jack Lumber Limited (JLL) entered into a contract with lightwood Industries (LL) of the heights of the hill to sell lumber planks 10 feet long at $100 each for the next two years to LL (end 25thMay 2012). LL has another contract with Deadbeat Homes to build kitchen cupboards at Deadbeat’s housing Site in Paramin for which the lumber plank are used.JLL delivered over 1000 planks during 2010 and was paid the contract price by LL. However, in January 2011 JLL announce a potential increase in the price of lumber planks to $110 per plank and warned of further increases to come in subsequent months.LL in February 2011 entered into another contract to build cupboard for Strongback Housing Limited at their housing site in Biche.In April 2011 JLL announce an official increase in prices to $120 per plank. At this point LL requested a meeting with JLL to discuss this price increase and it effects on LL activities at it’s construction site in Paramin and Biche. After the meeting JLL submitted a revised contract with the new pricing arrangement.LL accepted deliveries of the lumber planks from JLL which reflected the new pricing arrangement of $120 but paid the initial contract sum of $100 per plank and as such LL was in arrears to JLL.LL is adamant that they have a binding arrangement with JLL for two years ending 25thMay 2012 to purchase lumber planks at $100 and JLL subsequent contractual arrangement in April 2011 failed for want of consideration.The Lawyers for LL has indicated that JLL is already obligated to sell at $100 per plank before the new contractual arrangement in April 2011 to sell at $120.lightwood Industries (LL) is owned by Mr Lightwood your Father and he is aware that you are currently pursuing Business Law and he sought you advice on the issue. Please advised Mr Lightwood on the issue of consideration.

CLICK HERE TO HAVE ONE OF OUR WRITERS WRITE THIS PAPER FOR YOU AND GIVE YOU AN A+ QUALITY PAPER WITHIN THE SET DEADLINE

Read an editorial in a current newspaper (hard copy or online), and write a two-page argument evaluation essay evaluating the argumentation types and effectiveness it demonstrates using the concepts introduced in the class

CLICK HERE TO HAVE ONE OF OUR WRITERS WRITE THIS PAPER FOR YOU AND GIVE YOU AN A+ QUALITY PAPER WITHIN THE SET DEADLINE

Read an editorial in a current newspaper (hard copy or online), and write a two-page argument evaluation essay evaluating the argumentation types and effectiveness it demonstrates using the concepts introduced in the class

CLICK HERE TO HAVE ONE OF OUR WRITERS WRITE THIS PAPER FOR YOU AND GIVE YOU AN A+ QUALITY PAPER WITHIN THE SET DEADLINE

Miga, a French company, sold hundreds of millions of dollars worth of goods, much of it on credit, to various agencies of the Russian government. The first deals were made with the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), then, after the collapse of that government in 1991, with the Federative Socialist Soviet Republic of Russia (RSFSR), the successor government. The agreements called for binding arbitration of any disputes at the Chamber of Commerce of Stockholm, Sweden, under Swiss law, and subject to enforcement in court in New York. Following failure to make payments, the arbitrator awarded Miga $275 million, which Russia refused to pay. Miga brought suit in federal court in New York to enforce the arbitration award.
You be the judge. Who wins? Why? Make sure you address all the issues.

CLICK HERE TO HAVE ONE OF OUR WRITERS WRITE THIS PAPER FOR YOU AND GIVE YOU AN A+ QUALITY PAPER WITHIN THE SET DEADLINE

Research the history of prisons in the United States starting with Colonial times through the present. Prepare an 6-8 slide presentation, complete with speaker notes and at least one graphic, addressing the following: * Prepare a timeline highlighting significant milestones in the historical development of prisons in the United States. * Specify the stages of prison development. * For each stage, include the various philosophies and punishments used. * Include a slide on prison trends in the U.S. * The speaker notes should include all talking points for the presentation.

CLICK HERE TO HAVE ONE OF OUR WRITERS WRITE THIS PAPER FOR YOU AND GIVE YOU AN A+ QUALITY PAPER WITHIN THE SET DEADLINE

Nicola and May are partners in a business which operates a second-hand bookshop. They have two employees working for the business. The shop is located in leased premises. The business is doing well and has been profitable for them. </o:p>

An opportunity has arisen to purchase two second-hand book shops in nearby suburbs. Nicola and May are keen to expand their business. They will need a large injection of funds to purchase the additional businesses. They will need to appoint a manager to at least one of the shops, as they will be fully occupied by the other two. </o:p>

Nicola is concerned about her potential liability for the debts and liabilities of the partnership. Also, she is concerned about the future of the business if one of them should decide to leave, as the lease is in both of their names.</o:p>

Advise Nicola on the advantages and disadvantages of incorporating. If you recommend incorporation, what form of incorporation would be the most appropriate? Why?</o:p>

Question 2 (10 marks)</o:p>

Although the doctrine of separate legal entity was affirmed in the leading case of Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd [1897] AC 22, the court would lift the corporate veil in order to prevent a substantial injustice in some circumstances. Discuss. Your answer must refer to the relevant case law and Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).</o:p>

Question 3 (10 marks)</o:p>

The main business of Property Investment Pty Ltd is acquisition, development and selling of properties. There are three directors. At a meeting of the board of directors on 1 June 2012, a proposal was presented by David, a director of Property Investment Pty Ltd, for the purchase of a site adjoining a rubbish dump for $3 million from a vendor namely Seaview Pty Ltd. Seaview Pty Ltd acquired the site for $2 million on 1 June 2010. David is the sole shareholder and his wife and son are directors of Seaview Pty Ltd. David did not disclose his personal interests in the site and the proposal was finally approved at a meeting of the board of directors of Property Investment Pty Ltd on 10 July 2012</o:p>

Advise David of any potential breach of directors’ duties to Property Investment Pty Ltd. Support your answer by reference to the relevant case law and Corporations Act 2001(Cth).</o:p>

CLICK HERE TO HAVE ONE OF OUR WRITERS WRITE THIS PAPER FOR YOU AND GIVE YOU AN A+ QUALITY PAPER WITHIN THE SET DEADLINE