Provide a bid strategy using the same firm and scenario from the first assignment.

Write a three to five (3-5) page paper in which you:

1. Review the action plan from the first assignment and create a future plan that is consistent with federal procurement opportunity’s mission or strategic plan.
2. Create a bid decision evaluation form, select a total of five (5) criteria of the firm’s current marketing position, and then score against the requested opportunity using the example on Figure 7.1 described in Chapter 7 of the textbook.
3. Develop a bid strategy that provides a competitive edge over the peer federal acquisition market using five (5) customer key evaluation requirements (CKERs).

Respond to a RFP using the same firm and scenario from the first and second assignments.

1. Write a four to six (4-6) page paper in which you:
2. Review the firm’s organizational structure and then develop a matrix of five (5) roles, responsibilities, and authority for the key members of the captured team to execute the proposal.
3. Read the RFP and then provide the method the company will use to respond to the RFP ambiguity by using a competitive advantage approach.

Provide a Proposal Preparation Plan using the same firm and scenario from the previous assignments.

Write a six to eight (6-8) page paper in which you:

1. Discuss and prepare a work breakdown structure (WBS) showing a condensed version of cost estimates, using the price to win (PTW) cost approach. Use the example shown in Chapter 14 of the textbook as a guide.
2. Describe the strategies that could be implemented to prevent unethical practices and promote compliance with federal guidelines in the selected contract type’s performance risk and profit incentive.

Write a seven to eight (7-8) page paper in which you:

1. Recommend a project portfolio management method for your selected project. Provide a rationale  for your recommendation. Note: Be sure to align your project with the strategic efforts of the Organization.

1. Create an outline of an executive summary that includes the type of problem, requirements, and  Proposed  business problem solutions.

1. State the vision and the goal of the project. Note: Be sure that the goals are Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic, and Timely (S.M.A.R.T.).

1. Determine five (5) major deliverables of the project, and explain the importance of each major deliverable.

Please use the project from Assignment 1 to complete this assignment, which requires that you provide the necessary scope for your project.

A project scope includes many variables. The Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) must be defined prior to the start of the project to ensure that all of the details are planned.

Write an eight to ten (8-10) page project charter in which you:

1. Define the project including the vision, objectives, and scope of the project.
2. Determine the customers who will use the deliverables produced from the project.
3. Specify the key stakeholders for this project.
4. Determine the role and responsibilities of each project team resource. Include the scheduling duration for each resource.

Please use the project from Assignment 1 and 2 to complete this assignment.

Your project is now in its closing process. You are ready to present a final report to your major stakeholders.

Develop a Closing Process PowerPoint Presentation. Your PowerPoint must have speaker notes and these speaker notes must be written as if you were presenting this project to your stakeholders. A template is provided for your use. You can modify the template based on your professor’s instructions. Do not omit any information from the template because the information aligns with the rubric.

Prepare a twelve to fifteen (12-15) slide presentation in which you:

1. Identify the project objectives and how the project team has met each of the identified objectives.
2. Analyze the Work Breakdown Structure (WBS), along with explanation for each task.
3. Create a timeline, and note the critical path.
4. Identify stakeholders on the project team matrix.
5. Establish the approved budget, and identify the cost for resources.

Read the case study titled “A Peaceful Evacuation: Building a Multi-Project Battalion by Leading Upward.” before starting this assignment.

Write a 3-5 pages paper in which you:

1. Describe the leadership style that Lieutenant Colonel Yaron exhibited as the commander of a battalion for the evacuation operation. Provide three (3) examples of his leadership actions and behaviour. Discuss the pros and cons in each example you describe to support the response.

1. Analyze the leadership style that Lieutenant Colonel Daniel exhibited as he took center stage to lead this complex military operation. Provide three (3) examples of his leadership actions and behavior, assessing the pros and cons in each example you describe to support the response.

1. Compare and contrast the leadership styles of Lieutenant Colonel Yaron and Lieutenant Colonel Daniel. Provide three (3) examples of the similarities and differences between these project leaders, and discuss how each leader might address contemporary leadership issues and challenges in Israel today.

1. Discuss Lieutenant Colonel Yaron and Lieutenant Colonel Daniel interrelationship using Jung theory and the four (4) personality traits. Provide three (3) examples of how Lieutenant Colonel Yaron and Lieutenant Colonel Daniel personality and leadership style might enhance or hinder team performance for the complex military operation in this case study.

Your assignment must:

• Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.

• Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

• Apply the concepts of project leadership to implement sound leadership practices and effectively lead high-performance teams in a project environment.

• Determine the most appropriate leadership style (e.g., directive, consultative, participative, or delegative) in a project environment to effectively manage the project.

• Analyse the project team using Jung theory and the four personality traits to understand human behaviour and motivate team members.

• Use technology and information resources to research issues in project management leadership.

• Write clearly and concisely about project management leadership using proper writing mechanics.

In the current business world, team projects are commonplace. This assignment will use John Wooden’s Pyramid of Success, its different facets, how it relates to project management leadership, and how it is fulfilled in different circumstances. Visit this site dedicated to him to retrieve the information.

Write a three to five (3-5) page paper in which you:

1. Describe the extent to which John Wooden’s Pyramid of Success fits today’s business environment after reflecting on your own organization or one that you have observed. Provide three (3) examples to support the response.

1. Typify your leadership style, and provide three (3) examples of how your own temperament, motivation pattern, thinking styles, character, expectations, and leadership philosophy relate to or contrast themes discussed in John Wooden’s Pyramid of Success.

1. Analyze John Wooden’s Pyramid of Success and identify the aspects with which you agree and disagree. Provide a rationale for each aspect.

1. Create a new Pyramid of Success model based on your analysis of John Wooden’s Pyramid of Success, and provide a rationale for each aspect or step of this new model.

1. Using either the coaching philosophy of John Wooden’s Pyramid of Success or your own newly designed Pyramid ofSuccess model, develop a step-by-step strategy that self-directed project team members may use to adapt to any project-related crisis.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

• Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.

• Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

• Analyze the interests, temperaments, motivation patterns, and thinking styles to effectively motivate project team members.
• Determine the most appropriate leadership style (e.g., directive, consultative, participative, or delegative) in a project environment to effectively manage the project.
• Use technology and information resources to research issues in project management leadership.
• Write clearly and concisely and project management leadership using proper writing mechanics.
• Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills. Click here to access the rubric for this assignment.

Read the case study titled ‘Developing a Missile: The power of Autonomy and Learning’ Before starting this assignment.

Write a five to six (5-6) page paper in which you:

1. Formulate a one (1) paragraph vision statement for the team project as project leader for the Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile program.
2. Analyze key actions that Terry Little took to foster higher levels of performance, and recommend, in retrospect, a new course of action for a comprehensive organizational change as if you were in his position.
3. Describe the fallacies, consistencies, and inconsistencies that emerged from Terry Little’s leadership tactics, geared toward inspiring the team to greater heights. Construct an argument for how you would have acted differently than Terry Little and support the position.
4. Recommend at least three (3) strategies to the Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile program management team with a view to improving its operational performance. Provide three (3) specific examples to support the response.

Read the case study titled ‘Building of Memory: Managing Creativity through Action’ before starting this assignment.

Write a four to five (4-5) page paper in which you:

1. Suggest three (3) specific change management techniques that Shimon Kornfield should have used in order to manage the morale of the team assigned to the Yad Vashem memorial site project.

2. Outline the essential steps that Shimon Kornfield could have taken in order to endure that all team members learned of any proposed changes. Provide the rationale and justification for each step outlined.

3. Assess the criticality of the timing of communication in the success of the Yad Vashem memorial site project. Support the response with three specific examples.

4. Assume that two (2) key members of the team were replaced during the executing phase of the Yad Vesham memorial site project due to family crises. Discern actions Shimon Kornfield could take in order to establish trust and gain credibility with the remaining project participants.