In this five paragraph essay, you will present your position on the death penalty by arguing against either Mike Royko or Anna Quindlen. In the first paragraph of your essay, you will explain the writer’s position on the Death Penalty…something like “Mike Royko believes the death penalty is wrong because…” Then you will argue against three of the arguments he or she has made in three separate paragraphs. At the end of the essay, in your conclusion, you will state why you believe your position on the death penalty is the right one. Good Luck! Try to use good examples to illustrate why you think the way you do AND create body paragraphs that are unified around a topic statement.
CLICK HERE TO HAVE ONE OF OUR WRITERS WRITE THIS PAPER FOR YOU AND GIVE YOU AN A+ QUALITY PAPER WITHIN THE SET DEADLINE

Requirements:
Length 5 paragraphs. Papers that do not adhere to this page requirement will be returned for completion and graded one full grade down.
Quotation marks are required around any phrasing that is taken directly from sources.
Do not refer to writers by their first names only.
Appropriately titled.
Avoid the use of the word “you” in your essays; simply look for it as you proofread and edit it out.
You may use the word “I” in this essay as you are expressing your personal opinion.
Avoid the use of contractions in your academic essays; for example, use “cannot” instead of “can’t”; “do not” instead of “don’t.”
Your essay must be spell checked and grammar checked. Essays that have not been spell checked or grammar checked will be returned and considered incomplete. A one-half grade penalty will be applied.

CLICK HERE TO HAVE ONE OF OUR WRITERS WRITE THIS PAPER FOR YOU AND GIVE YOU AN A+ QUALITY PAPER WITHIN THE SET DEADLINE