Click here to order similar paper @Essaybay.net. 100% Original.Written from scratch by professional writers.
Aims of research Clearly defined objectives/research questions relevant to aim. Clear focus on aims / objectives maintained throughout. If appropriate, hypotheses defined and explained. Literature review Thorough review of appropriate secondary sources; relationship between the literature and the project explored (i.e. justification is linked to literature) Research methodology Explanation and justification of an appropriate methodology – approach and data collection techniques appropriate to aims and research questions.
Coursework Assignment Brief
Semester: | C16 Summer 2016 |
Module Code: | POG 360 |
Module Title: | Oil and Gas Management Project |
Programme | BSc (Honours) |
Level: | Level 6 |
Awarding Body: | Plymouth University |
Module Leader | Paul Booth |
Format: | Report |
Presentation: | No |
Any special requirements: | All work should be submitted as two hard copies with an acceptable Turnitin Report |
Word Limit: | 10,000 words for report and maximum 500 words for personal statement. (+/- 10%) |
Deadline date for submission: | TBA |
Learning outcomes to be examined in this assessment (please note that this is NOT the assessment task) | · Provide a detailed analysis of the policies designed to achieve stated corporate objectives of one or more organisation in the oil and gas industry, and an examination of the problems related to resource acquisition and deployment relevant to those policies.· Provide a relevant literature review on the problems investigated and relate current management theory to practical recommendations.
· Demonstrate a lucid and logic discourse containing objectives of the project, methodology, relevant literature review, recommendations for action, appropriate references and bibliography. · Demonstrate the elements of autonomy, personal responsibility and critical analysis and evaluation · Break down a project proposal into component parts and construct a time and cost constrained project plan towards its completion · Reflecting on Personal Development Planning |
Percentage of marks awarded for module: | This assignment is worth 100% of the total marks for the module |
Assessment criteria | Explanatory comments on the assessment criteria | Maximum marks for each section |
Aims of research | Clearly defined objectives/research questions relevant to aim. Clear focus on aims / objectives maintained throughout. If appropriate, hypotheses defined and explained. | 10% |
Literature review | Thorough review of appropriate secondary sources; relationship between the literature and the project explored (i.e. justification is linked to literature) | (20%) |
Research methodology | Explanation and justification of an appropriate methodology – approach and data collection techniques appropriate to aims and research questions. | (20%) |
Data Analysis | Appropriate analysis of data in the light of the research objectives and questions. Clear and analytical presentation of findings. | (10%) |
Discussion – | Results discussed, highlighting significant findings and comparing theory & practice where appropriate | (10%) |
Conclusions / recommendations | Based on a reasonable interpretation of both the research conducted and the existing literature. | (10%) |
Critical evaluation | Critical evaluation of own work. Areas for further research identified and discussed. | (5%) |
Overall layout and | Presentation is of an acceptable standard, logical and adds value to the document. Appropriate structure. | (5%) |
Reflection | Reflection on programme is detailed and insightful. | (10%) |
Background
N/A
Assignment Task
- Analyse one or more strategic problems in the oil and gas industries and produce a comprehensive report detailing the objectives, methodologies, findings, analysis, and conclusions of the research carried out above. The word length for the report is 10,000 words.
- Analyse the extent to which you have developed your knowledge, throughout the course and how the course and this project has helped your employability. This should be summarised as a personal statement of no more than 500 words and placed in an appendix to the main document.
Total Marks for Assignment: 100
Indicative Content
Aims of research
Define objectives/research questions relevant to aim. Maintain focus on aims/objectives throughout. Define and explain hypotheses. (Worth 10% of marks)
Literature review
Conduct thorough review of appropriate secondary sources. Critically explore relationship between the literature and the project. (Worth 20% of marks)
Research methodology
Explain and justify an appropriate methodology – approach and data collection techniques appropriate to aims and research questions. (Worth 20% of marks)
Data Analysis
Analysis of data in the light of the research objectives and questions. Analytical presentation of findings. (Worth 10% of marks)
Discussion
Discuss results highlighting significant findings and comparing theory & practice
(Worth 10% of marks)
Conclusions / recommendations
Formulate conclusions and recommendations based on interpretation of both the research conducted and the existing literature.
(Worth 10% of marks)
Critical evaluation
Critically evaluate work. Identify and discuss areas for further research.
(Worth 5% of marks)
Presentation
Present work to an acceptable standard that is logical and adds value to the document.
(Worth 5% of marks)
Reflection
Reflect in a detailed and insightful manner.
(Worth 10% of marks)
Marking Criteria for Assessment at Level 6 (Bachelors Degree with Honours)
Marks | 0-25 (Fail) | 26-39 (Fail) | 40-49 (3rd) | 50-59 (2.2) | 60-69 (2.1) | 70-85 (1st) | 70-85 (1st) | ||||||||
Assessment categories | |||||||||||||||
Knowledge & Understanding of Subject | Major gaps in knowledge andunderstanding of
material at this level. Substantial inaccuracies. |
Gaps in knowledge, with only superficialunderstanding.
Some significant inaccuracies. |
Threshold level.Understanding of key aspects of field of study; coherent knowledge, at least in part informed by current research in the subject discipline. | Systematic understanding offield(s) of study, as
indicated by relevant QAA subject benchmark statements for the degree programme. |
Good understanding of the field(s) ofstudy; coherent
knowledge, in line with subject benchmark, at least in part informed by current research in the subject discipline. |
Excellent knowledge and understanding ofthe main concepts
and key theories/ concepts of the discipline(s). Clear awareness of the limitations of the knowledge base. |
Highly detailed knowledge andunderstanding of the
main theories/concepts of the discipline(s), and an awareness of the ambiguities and limitations of knowledge. |
||||||||
Cognitive/ Intellectual Skills
(e.g. analysis and synthesis; logic and argument; analytical reflection; organisation and communication of ideas and evidence) |
Unsubstantiated generalizations, made without useof any credible evidence. Lack of logic, leading to unsupportable/
missing conclusions. Lack of any attempt to analyse, synthesise or evaluate. Poor communication of ideas. |
Some evidence of analytical intellectual skills,but for the most part descriptive. Ideas/findings sometimes illogical
and contradictory. Generalized statements made with scant evidence. Conclusions lack relevance. |
Threshold level.Evidence of some logical, analytical thinking and some attempts to synthesise, albeit with some weaknesses. Some evidence to support findings/
views, but evidence not consistently interpreted. Some relevant conclusions |
Evidence of some logical, analytical thinking andsynthesis. Can analyse new and/or abstract data and situations without
guidance. An emerging awareness of different stances and ability to use evidence to support the argument. Valid conclusions |
Sound, logical, analytical thinking; synthesis andevaluation. Ability to devise and sustain persuasive arguments, and to
review the reliability, validity & significance of evidence. Ability to communicate ideas and evidence accurately and convincingly. Sound, convincing conclusions. |
Thoroughly logical work, supported by judiciously selectedand evaluated evidence. High quality analysis, developed independently or
through effective collaboration.. Ability to investigate contradictory information and identify reasons for contradictions. Strong conclusions. |
Exceptional work; judiciously selected and evaluatedevidence. Very high quality analysis, developed independently or
through effective collaboration. Ability to investigate contradictory information and identify reasons for contradictions. Highly persuasive conclusions. |
||||||||
Use of Research- informed Literature(including referencing, appropriate academic conventions and academic honesty) | Little evidence of reading.Views and
findings unsupported and non-authoritative. Academic conventions largely ignored. |
Evidence of little reading and/or of reliance oninappropriate sources, and/or indiscriminate use of sources.
Academic conventions used inconsistently. |
Threshold level.References to a range of relevant sources. Some omissions and minor errors. Academic conventions evident and largely consistent, with minor lapses. | Knowledge, analysis and evaluation of arange of research- informed literature, including sources retrieved, analysed
independently. Academic skills consistently applied. |
Knowledge, analysis and evaluation of a range of research-informed literature, including sources retrieved, analysed independently with
accuracy and assurance. Good academic skills, consistently applied. |
Excellent knowledge of research informed literature embeddedin the work. Consistent analysis and evaluation of sources. High-level
academic skills consistently applied. |
Outstanding knowledge of research-informed literature embedded in the work. Consistent analysis and evaluation of sources. High-level academic skills consistently and professionally applied. | ||||||||
LEVEL 6 cont…
Graduate Skills for Life and Employment
(e.g. research- related skills; written, graphical and oral communication skills; group working; problem-solving; practical and professional skills) |
Little or no evidence of therequired skills in
any of the graduate skills identified in the programme specification at this level. |
Limited evidence of the graduate skillsidentified in the
programme specification. Significant weaknesses evident, which suggest that the candidate has not gained the skills necessary for graduate-level employment. |
Research skills:Can competently undertake reasonably straightforward research tasks with minimum guidance, but with minor weaknesses.
Cancommunicate in a range of formats, including orally, at a standard appropriate for graduate-level employment, and with limited weaknesses. Can generallywork effectively within a team,negotiating in a professional manner and managing conflict. Is largely confident and effective inidentifying and defining complex problems and applying knowledge and methods to their solution. Able torecognise own strengths and weaknessesin relation to graduate employment, with minor areas of weakness. |
Research skills:Can competently undertake reasonably straightforward research tasks with minimum guidance Cancommunicateeffectively in a range of formats, including orally, at
a standard appropriate for graduate-level employment, and with limited weaknesses. Can consistentlywork effectively within a team, negotiating in a professional manner and managing conflict. Is confident and flexible inidentifying and defining complex problems and applying knowledge and methods to their solution. Able toevaluate own strengths and weaknesses in relation to graduate employment. |
Research skills:Can successfully complete a range of research-like tasks, including evaluation, with very limited external guidance. Cancommunicatewell, confidently and consistently in a range of formats, including orally, at a standard appropriate for graduate-level employment.
Can consistentlywork very well within a team, leading & negotiating in a professional manner and managing conflict. Is confident and flexible inidentifying and defining a range of complex problems and applying knowledge and methods to their solution. Able to take initiative inevaluating own strengths and weaknesses in relation to graduate- level professional and practical skills, and act autonomously to develop new areas of skills as necessary. |
Research skills:Can very successfully complete a range of research-like tasks, including evaluation, with a significant degree of autonomy. Cancommunicateprofessionally and confidently in a range of formats, at a high standard appropriate for graduate-level employment.
Can work professionally within a team, showing leadership skills as appropriate, managing conflict and meeting obligations. Is professional and flexible inautonomously identifying and defining a range of complex problems and applying knowledge and methods to their solution. Able to show insight and autonomy in evaluating own strengths and weaknessesand developing professional and practical skills needed for graduate-level employment. |
Research skills:Exceptionally successful in a wide range of research-like tasks, including evaluation, with a high degree of autonomy Cancommunicatewith an exceptionally high level of professionalism, in a range of formats, including orally, appropriate for graduate-level employment.
Canwork exceptionally well and professionally within a team,showing leadership skills as appropriate, managing conflict, and meeting all obligations. Is exceptionally professional and flexible inautonomously defining and solving a range of complex problems and applying knowledge and methods to their solution. Outstanding ability toevaluate own strengths and weaknesses,showing outstanding attributes for graduate-level employment. |
||||||||
Marks for Level 6 | 0-25 (Fail) | 26-39 (Fail) | 40-49 (3rd) | 50-59 (2.2) | 60-69 (2.1) | 70-85 (1st) | 86-100 (1st) | ||||||||